Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-09 20:35 EST ------- Sorry for slowing this down... (In reply to comment #8) > > x-ar isn't in the mimetype database. x-archive is, but since xarchive > fails to open ar archives, I am not sure that it is right. Of x-ar was wrong. My fault, if I did not add this mimetype most likely nobody would have tried to open an .a file ;) Also I should have tested it before. (In reply to comment #13) > > * I don't want to accept the package with the mimetypes > for lha and rar without further discussion As I have not tested lha I have also removed x-lha and x-lhz now. I still would like rar in. If required programm (from the other repo) is not installed, xarchiver will show a message that tells you to install it. This should IMHO be allowed. > * the segfault with the .a is not a blocker to me for > devel, but it is for other branches (it may open a > security risk). Can you please clairfy the symlink-attack problem from comment #4 a little? My hacking skills are too low to explain Guiseppe what you mean. Seems like he already noticed there's something not sane, see http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review