Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: search4files - A handy file search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218907 fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-09 17:37 EST ------- REVIEW for f7bdb6dfd5f9fb3350954bb20c11381b search4files-0.1c-1.src.rpm OK - rpmlint gives a 'configure-without-libdir-spec' error on the srpm: ./configure doesn't take --configure. no libs, so this doesn't matter. OK - package named according to the package naming guidelines OK - specfile name matches package name OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license is open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license field in spec matches actual license OK - license included in source and correctly installed in %doc OK - spec is in American English OK - spec is legible and very well documented OK - source in srpm matches upstream by md5 d568697071bf93fad090a77e9d78f4d1 OK - package compiles and build into noarch rpm on core 6 i386 OK - BuildRequires are sane OK - no locales to worry about OK - no shared libs to worry about OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories it creates OK - no duplicates in %files OK - file permissions and %defattr are correct OK - valid clean section present OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no header files, static libs or *.pc files OK - no libtool archives OK - fedora-search4files.desktop is correctly installed with desktop-file-install OK - package doesn't own directories already owned by other files OK - package builds in mock (devel) OK - package works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review