Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669910 Zachary Doherty <zrdoherty@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zrdoherty@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Zachary Doherty <zrdoherty@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-18 04:46:48 EST --- I'm new to this so I don't want to be the official reviewer, however I will do my best to do an "unofficial" review. - Upstream simply licenses todo.txt_cli as GPL, according to Fedora's licensing guidelines this means it is licensed under *any* version of the GPL. Your package licenses it under GPLv1 incorrectly (it should be GPL+ instead). That is the only thing I see wrong with MUST requirements. In regards to non-mandatory SHOULD guidelines: - Upstream should be queried to include license text with their releases. - Work with upstream to get man pages included. Those are the only problems I saw while looking through your package. Like I said, I'm new to doing package reviews so it's pretty likely that I missed something. --Zach -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review