Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdflib-lite - Portable C library for dynamically generating PDF files Alias: pdflib-lite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219013 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-09 12:43 EST ------- Asked about the license on IRC: 09:10:14 XulChris | http://www.pdflib.com/products/pdflib-family/pdflib-lite/pdflib-lite-licensing/ <-- is this license okay for FE? 09:22:51 spot | XulChris: iirc, no 09:23:18 spot | commercial use restriction == BAD 09:36:24 tibbs | Hmm. pdflib-lite doesn't seem to have a commercial use restriction when used in open source applications. 09:36:47 XulChris | ya 09:37:08 XulChris | seems like its more GPL than BSD 09:37:13 tibbs | Doesn't seem any less free than the GPL, certainly. 09:38:24 XulChris | okay, well im going to assume its okay, see bug #219013 if anyone here sees something wrong with the license So it looks like it might be okay, will let this bug sit for a few days to see if there are any objections that come up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review