Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #12 from Mark McKinstry <mmckinst@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-17 20:35:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > Doesn't look like that ever happened. > > Before I agitate some more, I should ask if Mark is still interested in > submitting this package. I really don't have the time. The author has an unusual way of packaging his stuff which doesn't fit well with Fedora. While its possible to change it around and reduce the rpmlint complaints, I don't have the time necessary to do so. > Just to make a useful comment, I'd say that several of those rpmlint complaints > bear closer inspection. The whole "put a pile of stuff under /etc/apf" doesn't > seem very clean at all. I know the (non systemd) init system puts executables > there, and there's the whole /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts mess, but that > doesn't mean that new packages should come along and drop a bunch of > executables in /etc. And documentation really doesn't seem to belong in there > at all. If anyone wants to pick this up, internals/internals.conf is where you'd have to change some stuff but some custom patching will probably still be required. I'm working on another of his packages that has another unusual layout, its possible to make it fit in Fedora but its not easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review