Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-08 20:30 EST ------- Going with the Mozilla library naming conventions is OK, but these don't suggest adding a more or less artificial .6.0.0 suffix (artificial since it's part of the packaging layer and not upstream intention). If you check NSPR and NSS they keep the soname as is, e..g don't add a versioning suffix, and thus the respective devel file has no library parts at all, not even symlinks. So it's a) in comment #14. I played a bit with the specfile and implemented a), I'll post the patch in the next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review