[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311

--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2011-01-13 17:19:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Jason, I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (MUST:
> Each package must consistently use macros.). After this I've replaced all my
> foo to %{__foo}. Is it wrong? I'll fix if It's

The review guideline refers to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Macros

The consistency means that you should not mix using %{buildroot} and
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT, or %{optflags} and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, since these mean the same
thing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]