Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652546 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-13 09:12:35 EST --- Thanks for the comments! (In reply to comment #3) > +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing > > MUST Items: > [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > Rpmlint shows that the package contains no binary. > Are the *.beam files architecture dependent ? > If not then you should use BuildArch: noarch Unfortunately I can't, and that's an Erlang-specific issue. All Erlang packages must be installed into Erlang's own libdir ( %{_libdir}/erlang/lib ) which is arch-dependent (thus every package effectively becomes arch-dependent). I plan to eliminate this shortcoming in the future Fedora releases, but I wouldn't expect quick resolution (maybe in Fedora 17 or even in Fedora 18). > [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL says: > There are several cases where upstream is not providing the source to you in an > upstream tarball. > In these cases you must document how to generate the tarball used in the rpm > either through > a spec file comment or a script included as a separate SourceX:. > Done. Fixed comment, right above Source0. Here are the latest spec and src.rpm files: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-webmachine.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-webmachine-1.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review