Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libfap - C port of Ham::APRS::FAP APRS Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669010 Summary: Review Request: libfap - C port of Ham::APRS::FAP APRS Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: andrew.elwell@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/libfap.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6594808/Fedora/libfap-0.9-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: libfap is a C port of the Ham::APRS::FAP Finnish APRS Parser (Fabulous APRS Parser) Perl module. As the original Perl code, libfap parses normal, mic-e and compressed location packets, NMEA location packets, objects, items, messages, telemetry and most weather packets. For more description, see the Perl module. Notes 1) It's a dual licenced library (Artistic or GPL) -- Although Artistic 1.0 is NOT allowed as a fedora licence on its own, but IS allowed as a Perl licence (from the table https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses ) I have asked upstream (Tapio Aaltonen) to clarify this but no email response yet (only sent today) as they state in COPYING "Libfap may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the GNU General Public License. These licenses can be found in the licences directory of this package." without explicitly mentioning modification. 2) not all the text files included with the source are packaged (NEWS provides no information and INSTALL is the generic one -- as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation) 3) there is a test application 'smoketest' that is optional (make check) -- again should this be packaged with the relevant parts of the Makefile? It doesn't look like its a useful standalone application. 4) rpmlint output: $ rpmlint libfap* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I am still looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review