Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 --- Comment #12 from Karel Volnà <kvolny@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-11 06:56:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > * What kind of hardware should I have ? any that runs Fedora :-) ... well, in theory, you should test on all architectures supported by the package, in practice it is enough to use one > * How many resources are required on the machine(s) (RAM, disk) ? there are no such requirements - it is nice if you have enough resources to compile packages you maintain (i.e. you need disk space for the development packages), but you can workaround by using scratch build feature in koji > * What are the requirements on the Fedora install(s) ? > (So far, I have tended to skip every other release, lazy, probably. > But that probably won't do, as a Fedora developer ? ) it is not that important what are you running, but it is nice if you "dogfood" i.e. use the recent version of the package (on a recent system) yourself you can also install different release in a virtual machine ... > * Excluding the work done on the actual packages (which probably varies > wildly), how much free time (per week ? day ??) must one have to keep up > with things ? hard to tell, depends on your level of involvement ... you are not obliged to follow all the news and what is cooking, it is sufficient to keep eye on the announcements (which is low volume, a few messages per week), and there is not much to act on - transition of development resources from cvs to git or similar things don't happen every day don't be afraid, just try that, and if you find it too much, you can always give up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review