Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnbd - global network block device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209511 bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-08 06:53 EST ------- I don't see you in the owners list, so I can only provide you an unofficial review. I'm flipping the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker on for you too, since you will have to have a sponsor do an official review. rpmlint on all packages is silent. mock-build on FC6 is successful Must items: - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Include COPYING file in %doc - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. I have not been able to verify this - Source0 should be a URL that points to the donwloadable file. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc Document why ExclusiveArch is used. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Your macro use is consistent. However, I would suggest replacing "./configure --mandir=%{_mandir} --libdir=%{_libdir}" with "%{configure}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review