Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213 Ricky Zhou <rzhou@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rzhou@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Zhou <rzhou@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-07 20:52:17 EST --- OK - rpmlint clean yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14.src.rpm yubikey-val.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://yubikey-val-server-php.googlecode.com/files/yubikey-val-2.7.tgz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14.noarch.rpm yubikey-val.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ykval/ykval-config.php 0640L yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-export yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-queue yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-import yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-checksum-clients 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Non-readable error and google code warning are false positives. OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file name matches base package name OK - meets packaging guidelines OK - meets licensing guidelines OK - license field matches OK - spec in American English OK - spec is legible OK - spec sources match upstream OK - builds in mock OK - no bundled libs OK - owns its directories, does not own files owned by other packages OK - does not list a file more than once OK - permissions are OK OK - consistently uses macros OK - contains code or permissible content OK - files in %doc do not affect runtime OK - filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review