[Bug 666763] Review Request: ax_emergency_listen - monitors APRS emergency packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666763

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-04 15:23:00 EST ---
rpmlint -I invalid-build-requires just says:
  Your source package contains a dependency not compliant with the lib64
naming.
  This BuildRequires dependency will not be resolved on lib64 platforms (eg.
  amd64).
which isn't very helpful.  So, rpmlint source to the rescue.  These three lines
from TagsCheck.py are relevant:

lib_devel_number_regex = re.compile('^lib(.*?)([0-9.]+)(_[0-9.]+)?-devel')
if is_source and lib_devel_number_regex.search(d[0]):
  printError(pkg, 'invalid-build-requires', d[0])

So, libax25-devel trips the warning.  I can't see why it should, so the
complaint looks bogus to me.  I suspect that said warning is more meaningful on
some other distribution having that would use a naming convention like
'libfoo32-devel'.  I've really only experience with Fedora, though, so I can't
say what distribution that would be.

I'd simply note that the rpmlint complaint is invalid and move on.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]