Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225255 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-01 14:15:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > any idea what the difference between this package's source tree > > and arptables-0.0.3-3 from ebtables.sourceforge.net ? Is this package a > > fork ? Any pointers to the story behind how we ended up with two different > > ones would be much appreciated... > > No idea what should be marked as a fork. These two packages have the same > basis. Looks pretty much like arptables_jf is the fork, since it reuses the arptables name with a _jf suffix, was created by a Redhat employee, and is also only used by Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review