Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #39 from Minnikhanov <minnikhanov@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-01 08:53:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #33) > > heroku.gem have spec/ folder. > > > > Is need to realize %check section? > > Like that > > #%check > > #pushd %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} > > #%_bindir/spec spec > > #popd > > - Yes, it is preferable, however for this gem $ spec spec/ > needs webmock gem, which is not in Fedora and currently review > request for rubygem-webmock does not exist either (once > existed but it was closed unfinished: bug 588477) > > If you use rubygem-webmock you can package the srpm for Fedora. webmock gem have Runtime Dependencies addressable >= 2.2.2 addressable.gem is not in Fedora, all it's Runtime Dependencies there are in Fedora. 'httpclient.gem' is development dependency for addressable.gem Is it possible to offer Adam Young (bug 588477) return to pack rubygem-webmock and to pack rubygem-addressable also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review