Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661436 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-25 11:44:42 EST --- Well, (In reply to comment #32) > heroku.gem have Runtime Dependencies = launchy ~> 0.3.2 > > Now my template generate > Requires: rubygem(launchy) >= 0.3.2 > > Is need to generate 2 Requires? > Sample: > Requires: rubygem(launchy) >= 0.3.2 > Requires: rubygem(launchy) < 0.4 - Usually we write "Requires: rubygem(launchy) >= 0.3.2" part only, however technically writing also "Requires: rubygem(launchy) < 0.4" is not wrong (according to rubygem's dependency format). I asked on fedora-packaging mailing list how people think about writing both Requires (especially for writing "lower" Requires): http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-November/007501.html ... and got no answer, so for now I think that you can write "Requires: rubygem(launchy) < 0.4" also _if you want_. (In reply to comment #33) > heroku.gem have spec/ folder. > > Is need to realize %check section? > Like that > #%check > #pushd %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} > #%_bindir/spec spec > #popd - Yes, it is preferable, however for this gem $ spec spec/ needs webmock gem, which is not in Fedora and currently review request for rubygem-webmock does not exist either (once existed but it was closed unfinished: bug 588477) If you use rubygem-webmock you can package the srpm for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review