Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664624 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-23 13:22:00 EST --- After looking at "repoquery --whatrequires libdmapsharing", why not upgrade the existing libdmapsharing package in Fedora and port the existing API users to the new API? Instead of introducing a parallel installable package. And frankly, it there's a compelling reason to keep both, it wouldn't hurt to package both libraries in the same src.rpm, especially if headers, libraries and sonames are designed in a way they don't conflict. I think it's overhead to request a review of something that is in Fedora already as an older version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review