Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664154 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin@xxxxxxxxx) --- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-23 11:47:50 EST --- 1. Yeah, I was trying too hard to avoid redundancy. Fixed. 2. The "dev" doesn't seem too useful since "0.N" in the release field already indicates a pre-release -- but I used r288 since that indicates the specific SVN revision. Does that work for you? 3. Yes -- in fact I fixed that and copied up a new spec file shortly after the original, but you must have started the review super-quickly! :-) Thanks for your help, and here are the new files: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/python-babel-BabelGladeExtractor.spec http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-babel-BabelGladeExtractor-0.2-0.2.r288.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review