Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos@xxxxxxxx 2006-12-06 11:15 EST ------- > As for the package name, it matters not to me if it is called "hylafax" or "hylafax+". There does not seem to be any objection to renaming the package to be included in Fedora Extras "hylafax+", so that has answered my question and addressed my concern. Not only would it help prevent possible confusion between different software projects, it would be consistent with Lee's own sourceforge website and mailing lists. I agree that it's important to distinguish this package from the hylafax software that has been available from http://www.hylafax.org since 1997, especially in the event of it's submission to Fedora Extras. Whether hylafax+ is a fork has been discussed ad nauseum on the hylafax mailing list; if Lee would like to discuss it further that seems to be a more appropriate place than this ticket. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review