Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xl2tpd - replacement of l2tpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-06 09:54 EST ------- Before checking 1.1.06-3: (In reply to comment #6) > Timestamps: I am not sure why we don't want to show the timestamps of the > package build? I always strongly recommend to keep timestamps as: - They show if vendor (like you) have added some modifications against the original sources. - They show when the files are actually created. These are especially important when binary rpms contain a lot of header files, image files, documentations, etc.... Setting the timestamps of these files to build time, not the time when the contents of the files are actually changed confuses people when they want to check how those files are changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review