Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657577 Volker FrÃhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Volker FrÃhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> 2010-12-20 07:29:10 EST --- Package approved. Rpmlint: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Source files match upstream: sha256sum: 785104cb314447be4f3ab2fe13087cc1d6e6ca3bf171bbb57c85b099e977a534 BRs are listed. Compiles and builds on at least x86_64 (EPEL6, F13, 14 and Rawhide) and ppc64 (EPEL6). Package meets naming and versioning guidelines. Specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. License text included in package and open source-compatible; Build root is correct. Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. No duplicates in %files. Package contains code. No shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. Final provides and requires are sane: /bin/bash libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review