Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #113 from Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-20 02:26:58 EST --- SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax-5.5.0-1.src.rpm For what it's worth, I did solicit a sponsor on IRC as suggested. Although some brief discussion ensued nothing became of it other than comments similar to, "Oh, that package... I'm not going to touch it." I understand the blocks to be as follows: 1) package naming - there is some objection to using "hylafax" as the package name, however, as yet no prospective sponsor has committed to sponsoring the package inclusion if the package name is changed to "hylafax+". 2) conflict with mgetty-sendfax - in order for package inclusion to occur there will necessarily need to be collaboration in the "alternatives" so that users can switch between hylafax and mgetty-sendfax. (It is apparently unacceptable to have conflicting packages in the repository.) But, again, collaboration is apparently not easy to come-by. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review