Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-05 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Christoph, > > As the proposed package is HylaFAX+, I'd request that it be renamed such. I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+<version>.tar.gz, too. (In reply to comment #36) > > Have you tested the package yourself before you submitted it? > > Yes, I've been using it repeatedly. How have you been using this package if /usr/sbin/hylafax is not executable? >Here's what I see when I run rpmlint on the built RPM: > > [root@dhcp031 i386]# rpmlint hylafax-5.0.1-1.i386.rpm This is obviously not the same package, not the same release. It's not even the same version as the package you have submitted in comment #31. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review