[Bug 662604] Review Request: ibus-unikey - A Vietnamese engine for IBus input platform that uses Unikey.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604

--- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-15 07:59:43 EST ---
Review for 194d2fae199c9f49dead1e45172c3e00  ibus-unikey-0.5.1-1.fc14.src.rpm

OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/ibus-unikey-*
ibus-unikey.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://ibus-unikey.googlecode.com/files/ibus-unikey-0.5.1.tar.gz HTTP Error
404: Not Found
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Warning can be ignored, happens with all files on Google Code. I have verified
the URL with spectool.

OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
FIX - MUST: package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines, see below
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3)
OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
0b8f79941dc3e9a4744d52e88e4401dc
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on F14 x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
FIX - MUST: does not handle locales properly with %find_lang, see below
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
FIX - MUST: does not own all directories that it creates, see below
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
FIX - MUST: package does owns own files or directories already owned by other
packages, seel below
OK - Should: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8


SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
N/A - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
OK - Compiler flags ok
OK - Debuginfo complete
OK - SHOULD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (
or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
N/A - SHOULD: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.


Issues:
Use of %{_datadir}/locale/... is forbidden, use %find_lang instead. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files

The package does not own all folders that is creates: 
%{_datadir}/%{name}/* will only own the files inside that folder, use 
%{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories

The package owns the folder %{_datadir}/ibus/component/, which is already owned
by the ibus package. Since ibus is a dependency of this package it should only
own %{_datadir}/ibus/component/unikey.xml. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership

The package does not build on F15, attaching a build.log. You might want to
contact upstream about this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]