Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-13 08:40:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > about .pc files, and the Package Review Guidelines say: > > > > SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and > > this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. > > A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not > > installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. > > That's not my point. My point is FPC discussed whether packages shipping a > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc should own the %{_libdir}/pkgconfig directory. > > Unfortunately I can't find a trace of this discussion, ATM Doesn't this happen implicitly? The pkgconfig auto-provs/reqs generate a provide for the shipped .pc file(s) and a require for /usr/bin/pkg-config; this comes from the pkgconfig package, which owns the %{_libdir}/pkgconfig directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review