Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #17 from Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-12 15:38:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > Could you elaborate on why you chose to rename from wiiuse to libwiiuse? The > upstream project name seems to be wiiuse. No special reason, I think debian packages maybe calling it so, and because it was just a library I prepended lib to the name. I renamed the package, the spec, srpm, source and patches are now available here: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/wiiuse > The summary of the main package could use some work. It doesn't say anything > that the name of the package doesn't. I'd use something like "A library that > connects with several Nintendo Wii remotes". Ok, I expanded the summary. > The license seems to be GPLv3+, not GPLv3. At least the source says so rather > explicitly. Do you have some other source of information that indicates that > the license is GPLv3 only? (Also, I asked the legal list about the > LGPLv3/noncommercial thing and it appears that the best thing to do is ignore > it completely.) I probably just missed the (or later) clause the first time I read the license, then got busy evaluating whether the LGPLv3 part could be used or not in Fedora and came to the conclusion it was not free and therefore ignore it. (I am glad Legal came to the same conclusion :) Fixed to GPLv3+ Hopefully I addressed all remaining concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review