Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167147 ------- Additional Comments From pgregory@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-04 05:56 EST ------- > I am not going to review a package based on non-released sources. > > Either upstream will have to release their source first, or you will have to > implement a set of patches, based on older released version. This is a big of a quandary, the build and packaging is part of our source, so either we... 1. Release the source with the RPM packaging not working, then modify it to pass RPM compliance requirements, resulting in the released source and the RPM valid source being out of sync. Not nice, especially as to fit all the RPM requirements it seems will result in changes to the build system, i.e. significant changes from the released source. or 2. Don't release the source until the RPM compliance is met, resulting in the RPM version being in release step with the non-RPM version, which is much more preferable from a management point of view. But the reviewer has stated that they are not prepared to review RPM compliance until the source is released. Chicken and egg. It seems that this policy makes it very difficult to release in a clean and manageable way if your release platforms include FC RPM. Any suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review