Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-04 02:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I might be interested in being the primary maintainer of this package. I > believe that I can list you as co-maintainer so that you get bugzilla tickets. > As things move forward, until there are more fine-grained access controls i can > be the gatekeeper for any fedora extras cvs commits you want to make to the > package. You can build a public track-record of 'right action' by communicating > with me through bugzilla and make it easier to gain contributor status. That would be great! > What is the most recent spec and srpm that I should look at. See comment #7 for links to the current spec and srpm. > And most importantly, has there been a previous review that would have counted > as a full review if you hadn't needed sponsorship. I want to see if I can > contact a reviewer who is already looked at this so when I re submit it, we can > streamline the timetable and get this in quickly. The review is as documented in the early comments of this bug ticket. The person who helped me was Sander Hoentjen, and we ironed out all the problems with the spec. Everything seemed to be fine after that much review. Thank you very much for your offer, and being co-maintainer would be a very good way to get any required changes into the package so that it can be included in Fedora Extras. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review