Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy - array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218195 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos@xxxxxxxx 2006-12-03 20:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I take it you did your mock builds on 64bit hardware and had no weird problems > associated /usr/lib/ versus /usr/lib64 ? I always use mock on 64 bits for that reason, and the fact that sitelib != sitearch (for python packages) as well. > -jef (In reply to comment #6) > > These should address all the comments concerning the unnecessary explicit > requires, and builds against fftw instead of fftw2. > > looking more closely at the rpmlint output, I'm getting errors mixed in with the > warnings of the form: > E: scipy non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scipy/signal/setup.py 0644 > > There are a number of these and its all due to the existance of > #!/usr/bin/env python > > at the top of each file. > > Should I take the time to patch this out to be correct for fedora and to adjust > permissions on these files accordingly. The real problem is, is that many times > included python files are never meant to be run as executables even though they > have the /usr/bin/whatever header string. To me those warnings are bogus since I agree with your analysis. I noticed them before, while doing the review, but I have ignored them on purpose. > -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review