[Bug 639292] Review Request: erlang-etorrent - Erlang BitTorrent client and library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639292

--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-05 13:49:27 EST ---
rpmlint output:

sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-etorrent-1.1.2-1.fc12.ppc.rpm 
erlang-etorrent.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
erlang-etorrent.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-etorrent.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
erlang-etorrent.ppc: W: no-manual-page-for-binary etorrentctl
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:

The first three messages are common for almost all erlang-related applications.
Unfortunately, despite of whether package is arch-dependent or not it must be
installed into %{_libdir} which is arch-dependent. The message
"explicit-lib-dependency" should be ignored too - erlang/otp dependencies are
still cannot be auto-detected (I'm working on this - expect something working
in F-15 or F-16).

The last message means exactly what it says - there are no man-pages for this
package yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]