Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654374 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-04 14:45:34 EST --- In fact the .la files should be stripped. I do notice that espeak support is disabled by default anyway, so in that case, no, it's not a problem for *us* (at least at the moment). It's still proper to let upstream know, especially because, since they do turn it on for Win32/WinCE that means those packages are technically illegal! They don't need to do GPLv2+ -- the other alternatives if they want to use espeak by default on some platforms is to either switch to GPLv3 (only), or dual-license with GPLv2/GPLv3 (if the GPLv3 terms are acceptable, and they just worry about what GPLv4 might look like). *Or* ask espeak to grant them an exception. Again, GPL-based libraries meant for linking against are just *evil* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review