Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Alias: vdr-sudoku https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216352 chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-03 14:33 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - source match upstream a32cc677477349823469542896ad389d vdr-sudoku-0.1.2.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not own are owned by Requires packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - devel subpackage not required - no .la files - not a GUI application needing a .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review