Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-12-01 17:52:03 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > BTW, I also asked about the murmurhash license and the result is that we'll > just use it under the MIT license. ok, thanks. > Is there some other part of the software > that is public domain? Just some examples or scripts, which are not installed or used later on. So I guess Public Domain can be deleted now... > Also, keep in mind that the license tag reflects the > binary package, not the source package, so it is not useful to indicate which > parts of the source are under which license. Yes, the python part of shedskin is GPLv3 and the c++ library is MIT (used for linking later on). So "GPLv3 and MIT" should be correct, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review