Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001 --- Comment #5 from Rok Papez <rok.papez@xxxxxxxx> 2010-12-01 05:07:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > I note that Rok never responded to Andy's comment. A few folks have wanted to > get Heimdal into Fedora and this is the second review ticket that's been > filed, but for some reason things seem to stall out. Actually I wrote privately to Andy, I'm attaching a snippet: ================================================================ Regarding the libexec vs. sbin... I think libexec is for executables that are not supposed to be run by a (super)user directly but by other programmes. I'll check with the newest FHS since it's been some time since I've studied it. Other comments I agree with or need to study them closer :)). Fedora does some things differently and I plan to suport bith CentOS latest and Fedora with the same .src.rpm. Looking forward to your specs file as I plan to make use of it ;). ================================================================ > What's happening with this one? I'm just a packager here ;-). Not sure why Fedora ignored this package submission. On the Heimdal front I'm more or less waiting for Heimdal 1.4.1 final and Centos 6. Since it's been quite a long time since 1.4.1rc1 was released and interest seems to have picked up, I've prepared the new release: SRPMS: http://www.pingo.org/aai/heimdal/heimdal-1.4.1rc1-1.arnes.src.rpm Fedora14 i386 and x86_64 build: http://www.pingo.org/aai/heimdal/fedora14/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review