Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554187 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-29 10:42:21 EST --- "All code is released to the public domain. For business purposes, Murmurhash is under the MIT license." I'm having trouble understanding what that actually means. Is it public domain or not? What are "business purposes"? Why do software authors think they can just make random legal-sounding statements like that? Being a separate upstream project (own version, release schedule, license, etc.) the murmurhash code would seem to run afoul of the bundled library policy. It seems like a pretty clear exception (it's only 50 lines of code anyway) but the current policy has no automatic exemption based on size. Can you file an exception request with FPC? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review