Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Ville Skyttà <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: jing - |Review Request: jing-trang |RELAX NG validator in Java |- Schema validation and | |conversion based on RELAX | |NG --- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttà <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 2010-11-28 10:02:03 EST --- http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/jing-trang.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/jing-trang-20091111-4.fc13.src.rpm It took some effort to get this built from upstream svn checkout, but here goes. Unfortunately not all of the test suite could be done because (generating) it has dependencies to an old version of saxon which we don't have. All rpmlint messages are ignorable: dtdinst.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dtdinst jing-trang.src: W: strange-permission jing-trang-prepare-tarball.sh 0755L jing-trang.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jing-trang-20091111.tar.xz jing.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) validator -> invalidator, validation, validate jing.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US validator -> invalidator, validation, validate jing.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/jing-20091111-4.fc14/doc/api /usr/share/javadoc/jing jing.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jing trang.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multi -> Mulch, Mufti trang.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary trang 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review