Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654374 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |fo Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel+fdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-26 05:40:26 EST --- Hi Viji, We need the instructions to generate the tarball to have reproducible results; so the safest way is to use the particular VCS's archiving functionality, *and* specify the desired revision. In this case, the following works: svn co https://navit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/navit/trunk/navit (cd navit ; svn export -r %%{svn} . ../%{name}-%%{svn}) tar cvjf %%{name}-%%{svn}.tar.bz2 %%{name}-%%{svn} and adjust the %dirname accordingly; I had to add %{svn} otherwise it conflicts with either the directory created by the checkout (navit) or the ./navit subdirectory inside it -- it's quite annoying that SVN does not let one output directly to stdout, and thus just pipe it directly to tar without having to create a temporary directory on the FS! Right now, the MD5sums don't match between your tarball and the one I generate (even if I output to a directory called "navit" without the SVN revision). Creating the archive using svn export, while not guaranteed, would probably be more reliable as the files would be exported in the same order, and so hopefully the filesystem will list it in the same order for tar! Not as good as being able to just stream the output to tar, definitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review