Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-25 12:54:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > To summarize, I found only these two minor glitches: > * Consider if is possible to make the package noarch Unfortunately it's not possible right now. It is by design that Erlang VM will look into %{_libdir}/erlang/ directory (which is arch-dependent) for its modules at startup. Yes, it's possible to add another search paths, but it will require massive amount of work and testing. > * The license should be Erlang public license. Done! Not sure how could I miss this. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gproc.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gproc-0-0.3.20100929gitf0807c9.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review