Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579925 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-25 09:49:59 EST --- I don't know much about tcl and we don't get many tcl packages submitted, but we do have a guidelines page. I suppose that anyone who was interested in tcl would have reviewed this already, so I'll go ahead and take care of it. The package does not meet the naming guidelines, which require that tcl packages have a "tcl-" prefix. You can have Provides: tclreadline if you want. 2.1.0 still seems to be the latest version. In fact, upstream seems to be thoroughly dead; the last commit was something like nine years ago. Perhaps you and the Debian folks could get together and fork the package. You've already changed the API of the package (with the prompt2 stuff) so it's not much of a stretch. Otherwise, who is going to ensure compatibility with future tcl development? Can you comment on the 20+ rpmlint complaints of the form tclreadline.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libtclreadline-2.1.0.so Tcl_DoOneEvent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review