Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #22 from Christof Damian <christof@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-23 14:38:05 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > > I haven't updated it because nobody seems to be interested in reviewing it and > > everybody who does gives up after a while. > > Well, the other side is that if people see that it's out of date perhaps they > don't want to spend time reviewing it. So it works both ways. I agree, I have updated it to the current release: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.4.8-1.fc13.src.rpm > > The symfony project itself also doesn't seem to be interested in a package. > > If they don't want their software packaged, perhaps we shouldn't be packaging > it? I don't think they are an exception. A lot of project are of the opinion that the best way to distribute software is a build directly from them, ideally with all approved versions of libraries bundled. > > yes, but this is quite common. > > I know; as a member of the packaging committee, I'm just lamenting the fact > that the guideline we wrote makes for dumb-looking package names. > > I can't promise a review in the future but I'll watch this ticket. Thanks, me too. As I mentioned above, this review request has brought some other packages into Fedora so it is a win anyway. I understand that it is a difficult beast and maybe not with a big audience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review