Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594064 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-22 13:08:55 EST --- > Sorry for being so direct. It doesn't change a thing, though. It's not the first time you've failed to respond during review. Bug 477958 is just the old ticket for the previous review of this package. It should have been reopened instead of restarting here. Especially, since the non-responsiveness has led to dropping the NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug dependency, which hasn't been added to this new ticket. You are free to disagree, but what I've commented on is a real packaging mistake that reduces the quality of your spec file. If you don't show interest in hints about packaging problems which affect your own package, it will be difficult to find somebody to sponsor you. If you don't find the time to respond during review, why would you respond to general bug reports and other requests, which take more time than a trivial packaging fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review