[Bug 218020] Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: postgrey - Postfix Greylisting Policy Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218020


mjw@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mjw@xxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From mjw@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-12-01 13:26 EST -------
I created the second rpm in #182027.  I am not currently an extras maintainer,
so if Matthias is, I think that clearly trumps me.  I'd be more than happy to
maintain the package, but I haven't even had time to figure out the process of
getting the proper access (I'm still migrating all of my boxes to FC5 from
another distro).  The one thing I do sort of like in my spec file is the
following, which builds a man page:

%build
%{_bindir}/pod2man --center="Postgrey Policy Server for Postfix" --section="8"
postgrey > postgrey.8


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]