[Bug 648053] Review Request: libMicro - Portable micro-benchmarks for various system and library calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648053

--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-21 14:54:58 EST ---
Run rpmlint on the src.rpm and your built rpms. It's one of the things a
packager ought to do. The ReviewGuidelines are not specific to the reviewer(s).
;)


> %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/*

What package owns  %{_libexecdir}/%{name}  then?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories


> I don't think we should use %{optflags} on this one, we don't want
> to impact the benchmark. Opinions appreciated.

Not using %optflags and hence also creating a bad -debuginfo package doesn't
fly.

How much overhead do you expect from the code that does the measuring  compared
with the actual execution time of the system calls?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]