Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-19 14:01:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > Thanks; so we probably don't need: > > Provides: egw-pear = %{version} > Provides: egw_pear = %{version} Yes, if removed Obsoletes it also should be. > Similarly, I guess we don't need: > > Provides: egw-core = %{version} > Provides: egw-etemplate = %{version} > Provides: %{name}-etemplate = %{version} > > for the core package, right? May be... I think it is atavism. > I now suggest deleting only the zero-length language files, which are all > together in this directory. (See below for HTML; I agree with you that HTML is > not a problem). These empty language files serve absolutely no purpose and only > add useless cruft to the installation. I do not see any advantage for that, but let it be if you want. > All that aside, unfortunately the SRPM you posted in comment #14 doesn't build: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2610482&name=build.log Build also fixed. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur-0.10.0-4.fc13.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review