Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648986 --- Comment #8 from Tim Waugh <twaugh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-18 10:09:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > > We use 'import cups' and 'import smbc' in Python scripts which gives me a > > python-cups and python-smbc package names. > > This is true - the Python modules are not named consistently. They're consistent with how pygtk names things, which I thought was a good example at the time. > (In reply to comment #6) > > I don't have a strong point of view about this either way. If I were naming > > the upstream tarballs again today I would probably choose "python-cups" and > > "python-smbc". > > Very well. You could still do this, you know ;) It would mean changing the git repository names and URIs (can that even be done?), and the PyPI index name for pycups, etc. So the upstream names will stay the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review