Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-17 10:00:10 EST --- I don't know if Jerry intends to get back to this at some point or not, but here are a few comments. First, rpmlint: ccl.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ccl/lx86cl64 This implies that there will be selinux problems. ccl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ccl/lx86cl64 0775L I think this is due to a mock bug and is specific to some buildsystems; if it doesn't happen for you then it should probably be ignored. ccl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ccl Nice to have a manual page for command line applications. Not essential, though. ccl-contrib.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ccl-examples.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Why aren't these noarch, with the content in /usr/share? Or better yet, why are they not documentation instead? Also, are the examples actually useful? The cocoa stuff is apple-specific, is it not? ccl-contrib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ccl/contrib/krueger/InterfaceProjects/Lisp IB Plugins/LispControllerPlugin/LispControllerPlugin.h ccl-contrib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ccl/contrib/krueger/InterfaceProjects/Lisp IB Plugins/LispControllerPlugin/LispControllerInspector.h ccl-contrib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ccl/contrib/krueger/InterfaceProjects/Lisp IB Plugins/LispControllerPlugin/LispController.h ccl-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ccl/examples/FFI/Allocating-foreign-data-on-the-lisp-heap/ptrtest.c ccl-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ccl/examples/FFI/Using-basic-calls-and-types/typetest.c These are examples, so I expect this is OK, but see the previous complaint. ccl-contrib.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/ccl/contrib/krueger/InterfaceProjects/Utilities/date.lisp Why is this executable? How could it be run? Regarding PPC, it's still supported as a secondary arch, although I don't know how much is happening with it currently. As a courtesy you can ExcludeArch: the ppc stuff so they won't have to do it for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review