Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652803 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-15 14:03:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > As a nitpick point, since the %{_font_pkg} macro only contains a %files section > and %post and %postun sections, I would place the %{_font_pkg} macros where the > %post, %postun and %files sections normally are, i.e. at the end. At least to > me it is a bit confusing that they are in the middle of everything. It's easy to say that when you only have two subpackages, when you have more it really help to have everything in one place The template is really fighting rpm bugs here (for example the way rpm "forgot" to specify an end-of-description tag), it needs rpm fixes before it can be improved (I thin I've filled rfes or asked the people in charge for fixes/workaround advices a long time ago) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review