[Bug 653407] Review Request: rubygem-hashery - A collection of Hash-like classes for Ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653407

--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann <mgoldman@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-15 13:42:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Some notes:
> 
> * License
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Overall: ASL 2.0
> 
> GPL+
> ./lib/hashery/ini.rb
> ./lib/hashery/linkedlist.rb
> 
> GPLv2 or Ruby
> ./lib/hashery/ostructable.rb
> -----------------------------------------------------
>   - The license tag should be "ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and (GPLv2 or Ruby)"

Fixed!

> ! Usability
>   - It seems that hashery 1.3.0 gem is a bit broken
> -----------------------------------------------------
> [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ irb
> irb(main):001:0> require "rubygems"
> ge=> true
> irb(main):002:0> gem "hashery"
> => true
> irb(main):003:0> require "hashery"
> LoadError: no such file to load -- facets/basicobject
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
> `gem_original_require'
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hashery-1.3.0/lib/hashery/openobject.rb:1
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
> `gem_original_require'
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hashery-1.3.0/lib/hashery.rb:7
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
> `gem_original_require'
>  from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
>  from (irb):3
> -----------------------------------------------------
>     Currently I won't make this a blocker for this review request
>     ( as requiring scripts under lib/hashery/ directly seems to work,]
>       except for "lib/hashery/openobject.rb"), However would you contact the
> upstream?

Sure, created new issue for that:
https://github.com/rubyworks/hashery/issues/issue/5

> ? Scripts under test/
>   - How can scripts under test/ directory be used? (If some test programs can
>     be executable, would you do some tests in %check?)

Well, it's a bit complicated. Tests are written using Lemon framework
(https://github.com/proutils/lemon https://rubygems.org/gems/lemon). This
framework has big dependency tree which is not packaged as RPMs. Is this a hard
require to execute tests? Could we add it in next versions when the tree will
be at least half-packaged?

Updated files:

Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-hashery.spec
SRPM URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-hashery-1.3.0-2.fc14.src.rpm

Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]