Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537265 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-13 16:17:39 EST --- I'm just looking through these very old review requests. In general, I believe the tests for whether separate upstream tarballs go together into one SRPM goes like this: Are the libraries and main code all versioned together and released concurrently? If you have updates to one library but not the other, or to the main package but not the libraries, then with separate packaging you'd just have to update the part that changed. Code developed on separate schedules should go into separate packages. Are the libraries and main code so interdependent that updating one would require updates to all of the others (and require buildsystem hackery to accomplish)? Sometimes it's really just one project split up into a few tarballs. Rebuilding such a thing is painful and it may be reasonable to bundle it together. It also helps to know whether upstream considers them a unit. (And if so, why do they split them?) So, it would be good to have answers to those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review