Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-11-29 08:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > All of these mimetypes are included in file-roller and/or ark packages from > Core, too. That's not a good reason. Since we don't ship lha and rar we shouldn't open the corresponding files. file-roller and ark are broken. Also remember that core packages haven't gone through review and may contain mistakes. This one is not an obvious mistake, it may have been done on purpose, but still it is a mistake in my opinion. x-ar isn't in the mimetype database. x-archive is, but since xarchive fails to open ar archives, I am not sure that it is right. > And why not adding xarchiver for rpms and debs? file-roller or ark > also can't do more then list/extact debs/rpms, noone expects an achive manager > to install packages. I use file-roller a lot to quickly look into rpms, get the > spec from an srpm etc. The default action still is system-install-packages, so > IMO adding xarchiver can't do no harm. Ok for rpm and debs, the system of default seems right to me. And if one don't have the default app (pirut for rpm) installed, why not xarchiver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review